because the truth needs to be told

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

Sudhar Ghar, Alexander Maconochie and Jail Reforms 

 

An insight into the work of 18th century reformer, who achieved a lot, left behind a legacy, which has borne fruit three centuries later.

 

The gates of the prison walls in Punjab and India, display a huge billboard, Sudhar Ghar --Correction Home.  Contrast this to the remark of a member of the planning commission who had studied Tihar jail in Delhi. He is reported to have remarked that the prisoners at Tihar were doing their PhD in crime. Tihar was breeding criminals, not reformed citizens. Save for the efforts of Ms. Kiran Bedi, that too during her tenure as the prison chief, when pathbreaking changes were initiated, Tihar like all other prisons is back to ‘normal’. 

What AMC, Australia has done is to bring into focus the work of Alexander Maconochie on prison reforms.  

Alexander Maconochie was born in Edinburgh on 11 February 1787. By 1804 he was a midshipman in the Royal Navy. He was a lieutenant on the brig Grasshopper when it was wrecked on Christmas Eve 1811 off the Dutch coast and, along with everyone else on board, was taken prisoner and handed over to the French. They were forced to march in the cold winter from Holland to Verdun, and suffered more than two years’ misery as prisoners of war. This was Maconochie’s one traumatic taste of life in prison, and he never forgot it. 

   

Alexander Maconochie wanted to shift the focus of penology from punishment to reform. He argued that punishment on its own was a socially empty act without checks built into it, and saw no sense in punishing a criminal for his past without training him with incentives for his future.

 

Alexander Maconochie wanted to shift the focus of penology from punishment to reform. He argued that punishment on its own was a socially empty act without checks built into it, and saw no sense in punishing a criminal for his past without training him with incentives for his future. He argued that sentences should be indefinite - the convicts would have to earn a certain number of ‘marks’, or credits for good behaviour and hard work, before they were released. They would buy their way out of prison with these marks. To buy, they must save. 

Hence the length of his sentence was, within limits, up to the convict himself. Marks could be exchanged for either goods or time. The prisoner could buy “luxuries” with his marks from the gaol administration – extra food, tobacco, clothing etc. Maconochie believed his Marks System would be objective. Ideally, the convict would pay for everything beyond a diet of bread and water with the marks he earned.

As soon as a convict entered the system, he would begin his “Pilgrim’s Progress” with a short harsh stretch of confinement with hard labour and religious instruction as punishment for the past. 

Nobody in England or America, let alone penal Australia, had tried such therapies on convicts before. This idea of prison as a reforming institution would not win wider acceptance until well into the twentieth century. 

Norfolk Island under Maconochie 

Maconochie saw himself as entrusted by the British Government to reform the present system, and came to the island with the intention of introducing a change of regime.  

The gates of the prison compounds were opened, and the prisoners were free to wander and frolic as long as they “showed by retiring to their quarters at the sound of the bugle….that they might be trusted with safety”. They were given special food, and rum, which was paid for by Maconochie himself.  Maconochie noted that “not a single irregularity, or even anything approaching an irregularity, took place…every man quietly returned to his ward; some even anticipated the hour”. 

Maconochie pressed ahead with his plans for cultural and moral reform. He wanted books, to help teach the men trades, and to instil “energy, hopefulness in difficulty, regard and affection for our brethren in savage life”. He also stocked the prisoners’ library with moral and religious works, for he wanted the prisoners to think and argue together, not rot in their cells. He included the works of Shakespeare in his island library, feeling that theatrical training could help convicts overcome their passions. Music was to be his main therapy.  

Maconochie dismantled the gallows, which had stood as a permanent emblem of dread outside the gate of the prisoners’ barracks, built churches for Catholics and Protestants and a synagogue for the Jewish.   

Maconochie’s approach had done more to reform the Norfolk Island men than any amount of terror. During his administration, Maconochie had discharged 920 of the twice-convicted prisoners to a new life in Sydney.  By 1845 only twenty of them – a mere 2 percent - had been convicted again.  

Extracts from Maconochie's Gentlemen by Morris N., 2002, OUP.

Photos courtesy: Alexander Maconochie Centre website

24 September 2008
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Google  
 
  Read Also
  Reform & Compassion, not Penalty
 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
Alexander Maconochie Centre
  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
Submit News
Submit Announcements
Submit Events
Submit Photo
Submit a Letter  
Submit Feedback
 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas