because the truth needs to be told

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

 
 

Special Report
Editorial
Op-Ed
Opinion
Columns

Politics
Literature
Music
Art & Culture
Sikh Religion
Rights
1984
Books
Education
Business

Entertainment
Lifestyle
Travel
Health
Heritage
Sports
Kids Corner

Panjab
India
Pakistan
South Asia
US of A
Canada
Asia-Pacific
UK
Europe
Middle East
Africa
World
 

Archives
Newsletter
Advertise

Obituaries

Feedback
Contact Us
About Us
Site Map

R-rating for Shah Rukh’s smoking creative liberty
Gagandeep Kaur 

 

Shah Rukh Khan says that he accepts the advice of India’s health minister Dr. Ramadoss not to smoke, but only in private life. He does not want a ban on his creative liberty in cinema.  The author argues that cinestars sway impressionable minds and a ban on smoking in cinema is now a global phenomenon, the Grammy award to Amy Winehouse notwithstanding.

 

Showbiz has always influenced the lifestyle and health of society. Be it clothes, food or accessories, the entertainment industry has penetrated the very vein and limb of society. The popularity, charm of being the public face, the aura of being the household name, the association with the heritage and cultural societies, the perfect handshake with politicians have always added to the benefits of showbiz. 

Enjoying such an attitude seems justified when it has come after sailing through the rough and tough, old and bold, topsy-turvy, roller-coaster ride for the celebrity peak. When the celebrity status dances on the head of the cinestars, they go beyond the boundaries and their tolerance of refrain becomes an affront on their liberty.  

Shah Rukh Khan’s blanket protection to puffing scenes in movies under the garb of creative liberty in reply to Health Minister Dr. Ambumani Ramadoss’s request to Amitabh Bachhan and Shah Rukh Khan to avoiding smoking on screen does not come as a surprise.  In a world surcharged with individual liberties, Shah Rukh Khan has added another dimension of creative liberty, often used to justify near-pornographic scenes.   

The impact of cinema on children has never been a subject of detailed study, but there is no doubt whatsoever of the influence on impressionable minds.  The Salaam Bombay foundation survey reported that every second, 2 children in India try tobacco for the first time. 4 million children below the age of 15 years regularly use tobacco. It may be difficult to define the exact relationship but the fact remains.

Scientific data repeatedly have shown that a significant number of youth start smoking because of exposure to smoking in the movies; ¨ says Becky Freeman, Director, Action on Smoking and Health, New Zealand. This shows that not only India, but many countries including New Zealand are seized with this situation.  Freeman further says that, “we are asking Hollywood to stop pushing disease and addiction on youth by making simple changes in their rating system, which will ultimately reduce youth exposure to tobacco in movies worldwide.”

The always-on-the-swing film industry projects a rusty, metro-sexual, mafia-look-and-feel for the lead actor. The iconic glitz and the heart-throb stature associated with the celebs sweeps the innocent minds. According to a research, youngsters who watch films in which actors are seen smoking are three times as likely to take up the habit.

Smoking on screen in the Indian cinema has been a way out to release stress and in a stressful world, such depiction creates more problems than solves them.  Shah Rukh Khan will do well to remember that his creative liberty is adversely affecting the lives of people.  If the industry big-wigs do not build a code of self-censorship, then the next logical course is to adopt the Restricted Viewing tag to movies which have smoke scenes, excessive sex and violence scenes, as has been adopted by Hollywood.  

Big names of the Indian film industry participate in social and health awareness campaigns but when it comes to acting and earning money then health and society takes a back seat. 

Smoking in kid-rated movies does not sell movies, but it does sell cigarettes, says the ASH brochure. 

If Shah Rukh Khan needs more proof that the tobacco industry subtly enters the entertainment industry, then the following quote should be sufficient.

Our Primary objective will remain the same, to have smoking featured in a prominent way, especially when it is tied favourably with celebrities.¨ This is part of the letter written to President of RJ Reynolds Tobacco from its PR firm in 1981. “Many times we can get a display, a sign, a t-shirt, a logo, etc inserted into a positive scene, even when the product may not be used in the movie. This gives us a real life environment into which your name is used.¨ John McGinn, Advertising Director for American Tobacco Company.

Need we say more, Mr. Khan.  It is time to stub the butt.

20 February 2008
 

Bookmark with

Reddit    Yahoo     Furl    Delicious

Google  
 
  Read Also
  Silencing Smoking Guns 
  Associated Links
 WSN does not necessarily endorse content on these sites
  Pictorial warning from Dec. 1
 Snuffing out smoking with pictorial health warnings

 Amy Winehouse on crack

  Newsletter 
To subscribe, please send your email address to newsletterwsn@gmail.com
  Your WSN
Submit News
Submit Announcements
Submit Events
  Submit Photo
  Submit a Letter    
  Submit Feedback
 

 

 

 

Darbar Sahib Hukamnama | Home | Amritsar Times | WSN Weekly Available at | Advertise | Newsletter | Feedback | Contact Us

Copyright @ 2007 Amritsar Publications & Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

Site design, development and maintenance by Big Ideas