|
R-rating
for Shah Rukh’s smoking creative liberty
Gagandeep Kaur
| |
Shah Rukh Khan says that he
accepts the advice of India’s health minister Dr. Ramadoss not
to smoke, but only in private life. He does not want a ban on
his creative liberty in cinema. The author argues that
cinestars sway impressionable minds and a ban on smoking in
cinema is now a global phenomenon, the Grammy award to Amy
Winehouse notwithstanding. |
|
Showbiz
has always influenced the lifestyle and health of society. Be it
clothes, food or accessories, the entertainment industry has
penetrated the very vein and limb of society. The popularity, charm
of being the public face, the aura of being the household name, the
association with the heritage and cultural societies, the perfect
handshake with politicians have always added to the benefits of
showbiz.
Enjoying such an
attitude seems justified when it has come after sailing through the
rough and tough, old and bold, topsy-turvy, roller-coaster ride for
the celebrity peak. When the celebrity status dances on the head of
the cinestars, they go beyond the boundaries and their tolerance of
refrain becomes an affront on their liberty.
Shah Rukh Khan’s
blanket protection to puffing scenes in movies under the garb of
creative liberty in reply to Health Minister Dr. Ambumani Ramadoss’s
request to Amitabh Bachhan and Shah Rukh Khan to avoiding smoking on
screen does not come as a surprise. In a world surcharged with
individual liberties, Shah Rukh Khan has added another dimension of
creative liberty, often used to justify near-pornographic scenes.
The impact of
cinema on children has never been a subject of detailed study, but
there is no doubt whatsoever of the influence on impressionable
minds. The Salaam Bombay foundation survey reported that every
second, 2 children in
India try
tobacco for the first time. 4 million children below the age of 15
years regularly use tobacco. It may be difficult to define the exact
relationship but the fact remains.
Scientific data
repeatedly have shown that a significant number of youth start
smoking because of exposure to smoking in the movies; ¨ says Becky
Freeman, Director, Action on Smoking and Health, New Zealand. This
shows that not only India, but many countries including New Zealand
are seized with this situation. Freeman further says that, “we are
asking
Hollywood
to stop pushing disease and addiction on youth by making simple
changes in their rating system, which will ultimately reduce youth
exposure to tobacco in movies worldwide.”
The
always-on-the-swing film industry projects a rusty, metro-sexual,
mafia-look-and-feel for the lead actor. The iconic glitz and the
heart-throb stature associated with the celebs sweeps the innocent
minds. According to a research, youngsters who watch films in which
actors are seen smoking are three times as likely to take up the
habit.
Smoking on
screen in the Indian cinema has been a way out to release stress and
in a stressful world, such depiction creates more problems than
solves them. Shah Rukh Khan will do well to remember that his
creative liberty is adversely affecting the lives of people. If the
industry big-wigs do not build a code of self-censorship, then the
next logical course is to adopt the Restricted Viewing tag to movies
which have smoke scenes, excessive sex and violence scenes, as has
been adopted by
Hollywood.
Big names of the
Indian film industry participate in social and health awareness
campaigns but when it comes to acting and earning money then health
and society takes a back seat.
Smoking in
kid-rated movies does not sell movies, but it does sell cigarettes,
says the ASH brochure.
If Shah Rukh
Khan needs more proof that the tobacco industry subtly enters the
entertainment industry, then the following quote should be
sufficient.
Our Primary
objective will remain the same, to have smoking featured in a
prominent way, especially when it is tied favourably with
celebrities.¨ This is part of the letter written to President of RJ
Reynolds Tobacco from its PR firm in 1981. “Many times we can get a
display, a sign, a t-shirt, a logo, etc inserted into a positive
scene, even when the product may not be used in the movie. This
gives us a real life environment into which your name is used.¨ John
McGinn, Advertising Director for American Tobacco Company.
Need we say
more, Mr. Khan. It is time to stub the butt.
20 February 2008
|