|
Human Rights Debate, Indian
Nation State and Vaisakhi
In a matrix of
utter hopelessness and despair, and a politics of de-politicising
the youth and the rising middle class, any effort that endeavours to
re-focus the debate on people's movements, voices from the fringe
and the precious space in polity for dissent comes like a whiff of
fresh air. The current paradigm in which operate the media, the
government, the strange but obvious collusion among the mainstream
political parties on larger questions of economic and political
options before the country, has created a stiffling, muzzling,
muffling atmosphere in which voices of reason, dissent and debate
are castigated and tarred as separatists, undesirable, or rabble
rousers. It is such a situation that we welcome the initiative from
sections of
India's
civil society in the form of a seminar on the state of political
prisoners in India.
In fact, just as
the Sikh community is now moving into a celebratory period of
Vaisakhi and preparations are on across the globe from Surrey to
California to Washington to Wellington to Anandpur Sahib and
Amritsar for colourful nagar kirtans, it is once again a moment for
Sikhs to join heads together and think through the crisis that the
faith community is passing through. Vaisakhi represents the spirit
of the Khalsa and the spirit of the Khalsa cannot be devoid of
concerns about human rights and marginalised voices in society.
If Sarbat Da
Bhala be the motto of the Sikh community, then Sikhs cannot be seen
remaining silent about the ongoing struggles for the downtrodden.
India's lowered classes have a genuine grievance against the Sikh
leadership which has been unable to ensure an end to the oppressive
and inhuman construct of caste even after someone enters this faith.
Large sections of the community, particularly the poor and largely
from the marginalised or small farm domain, are suffering the
choices that India is making on its road to economic development, a
model that ensures remarkable economic well being for remarkably
fewer people at the cost of remarkably large multitudes of the poor.
We are saddled with community leaders incessantly talking of SEZs,
malls and air-conditioned travel without any regard to its politics.
As Barkha Dutt
has written recently, "The middle class Indian is scarily enamoured
of the idea of a mighty Nation State that rules with an iron fist."
No wonder, it has become second nature for the regime to oppress the
multitudes even as it rolls out 11 percent growth rate plans, a
countryside dotted with malls and superhighways for those enamoured
with the idea of a mighty Nation State.
In such a
matrix, the dissenter is not heard. So he shrieks, he screams, and a
shriek, a scream is enough for the Nation State to label him as an
undesirable. The label soon changes from dissenter to screamer to
separatist to terrorist. The Nation State stuffs its jails with
political prisoners. (If its record is better than Burmese junta,
consider this. Even as this WSN edition goes to the press, a top
general of Burma's military regime, Gen Maung Aye, is being hosted
by New
Delhi,
thus making India the first country to host Burmese junta top brass
after the brutal crackdown on protesting monks last September).
India has not
even defined any category of political prisoners, and the community
is well aware of its leaders being slapped with sedition cases the
moment they want even removal of a statue of any recognised human
rights violator. The seminar in Delhi was an attempt to focus debate
on this key area of human rights, just as this issue of WSN is our
contribution to the debate. Our cover story, the Special Report on
Sri Lanka, the open letter to Yasin Malik, the articles on editorial
and op-ed pages are underline our commitment to the cause. May this
Vaisakhi grant us the wisdom to re-connect to the core values of
Sarbat Da Bhala.
2
April
2008
|