|
SGPC Budget exercise a slur on
democratic norms
WSN Bureau
| |
There is much that the SGPC can learn from the way the
Diaspora manages its gurdwara funds. Hundreds of crores of money
management is an onerous responsibility, given the fact that a
sensitive issue like people's faith is involved |
|
AMRITSAR:
When a devout
bows before the holy Guru Granth Sahib, kneels, and before saying
his little prayer within, humbly places his little offering in the
locked 'golak' often positioned before the scripture, he does so
because he knows this is the gurughar's money and it will be used
very very carefully for purposes so lofty that the community will be
proud of these causes. Donations pour in all sizes, and not always
in cash. And the so-called Mini Parliament of Sikhs now has a budget
of Rs 387 crore. A whopping sum of money by any standards.
Obviously, one
does assume that considerable democratic processes and debates would
mark in decision making about how to utilise this money. Instead,
the Sikh community watches the SGPC budget exercise being reduced to
a joke year after year. There is much that the SGPC can learn from
the way the Diaspora manages its gurdwara funds. Hundreds of crores
of money management is an onerous responsibility, given the fact
that a sensitive issue like people's faith is involved.
But the SGPC
general house passed the Rs 387-crore budget with less than five
minutes of discussion, the dissenters being given no option to
debate and slogans of Bole So Nihal being used to drown out all
voices of logic at the Teja Singh Samundari Hall here on March 29.
The SGPC general
secretary Sukhdev Singh Bhaur was one of most strident critic of the
budgeting exercise during his years outside the Parkash Singh Badal-led
Akali Dal but now that Jathedar Gurcharan Singh Tohra is remembered
only at a function in his village once every year and Bhaur is
re-adjusted, he too seeks approval for the budget without any
discussion. Members like Manjit Singh Calcutta and Karnail Singh
Panjoli did try to start a debate but were stopped. It is a
different matter that during his own time, Calcutta too was part of
the similar budget exercises. The General House witnessed
acrimonious scenes.
What was most
sad was the acrimonious slanging match between Calcutta and SGPC
president Avtar Singh Makkar. At one stage, Makkar even asked
Calcutta to leave the venue. So much for the democratic traditions
of mini- Parliament. Members from Haryana, including Didar Singh
Nalvi and Jagdish Singh Jhinda, who have been demanding separate
gurdwara committee for Sikh shrines in their state, also joined
hands to boycott the proceedings.
The community
must also think why our top community leaders like Jathedar, Akal
Takht, Joginder Singh Vedanti, and Giani Gurbachan Singh, head
granthi, Golden Temple, make themselves part of such partisan
proceedings. Now, some are even threatening to move court against
the arbitrary approach of the SGPC regarding the budget.
As for the
discussion about how the community should make itself answerable to
that poor farmer who travels several kilometres and deposits his
fiver in the golak, that is something that will only seem like a
joke to punny men running big institutions.
2
April
2008
|